Development over metro station, Young & Jackson’s and City Square

Young & Jackson’s site

After they’ve finished the metro station entrance behind Young & Jacksons, the planning allows for a 10-12 storey building (up to the 40m height limit) wrapping right around (with a 6m gap next to the Nicholas Building). I’d much prefer we keep this view of old side walls intact, and allow just 3 or 4 floors, a nice arcade would do. But I also thought maybe you could make a new building fit in, by designing it with light wells, lift shafts and plain side walls, like older buildings around town. I’m also wistful about the neon signs that clusters here from the 40s-70s, so I’ve put some of them in too ! I’m doubtful a developer would do anything like this though. I’m half expecting a boring office block design to be announced any moment ☹️. My sketches based on streetview, the development envelope found on line, and last image is c1969, #AngusOCallaghan.

Update : the developer is Lendlease, as a perk of their metro contract, and their architects are Hassell with Rogers, Stirk Harbour; no news on scale or use.

1969, Angus O’Calaghan

City Square site

I was wondering what the new City Square was going to look like and realised the plans I have from 2017 are probably it – much the same as before, but about 1/3 taken up by the escalators and lifts and a flat area to get to them, all covered by a big glass roof (final design uncertain). There’s a bit more grass, a nice spouty water feature in the middle, while the lifts and vents are just flat clad in bluestone- it’s all very uninspired, especially compared to the stylish and impressive station hall below. And they’ve got Burke & Wills behind the tree line instead of on the corner (but perhaps that’s ok for over – herocised old white men idiot explorers?). Designers probably jointly the City of Melbourne and Metro architects Hassel with Rogers Stirk Harbour. Surely they could have given the design some spark ? And at least we should should know what the design is ! (But personally I’d rather see the site as cafes and lanes and buildings with interesting functions upstairs such as the city library – we don’t need the city square at all, we’ve got fed square, and we’ve lived without it for 6 years…)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.